<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fulcrum21, Inc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fulcrum21.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fulcrum21.com</link>
	<description>Technical Brilliance On Tap</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:13:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Proxmox VE: Open Source VMware ESXi Replacement?</title>
		<link>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=160</link>
		<comments>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=160#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulcrum21.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware ESXi is an excellent product, but it isn&#8217;t cheap.  Yes, there&#8217;s a free version, but it has limited features and some significant licensing restrictions.  Need centralized management, live migration, etc?  Get ready to spend some serious cash.  The same &#8230; <a href="http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=160">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware ESXi is an excellent product, but it isn&#8217;t cheap.  Yes, there&#8217;s a free version, but it has limited features and some significant licensing restrictions.  Need centralized management, live migration, etc?  Get ready to spend some serious cash.  The same is true for Xenserver and Hyper-V.</p>
<p>Enter <a href="http://www.proxmox.com">Proxmox VE</a>.  It utilizes KVM (Kernel-base Virtual Machine), which was developed by Red Hat and is included in the Linux kernel.  All nodes can be centrally managed from a web browser, and live migration is included.  It is a breeze to install.  Just download the iso file, burn a CD, boot and install on each node.  Proxmox runs on top of Debian Linux. One interesting twist is that Proxmox VE can run both fully virtualized KVM images or <a href="http://wiki.openvz.org">OpenVZ</a> templates on the same host.  More importantly, it&#8217;s free!  However, commercial support is available when you need it.  Unlike some open source products, there&#8217;s not a crippled free version and a fully-featured premium version.  Furthermore, quite a bit of documentation and video tutorials are available.  I encourage you to give it a test drive and donate to Proxmox if you like it.</p>
<p>Further reading:<br />
<a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/virtualization/proxmox-the-ultimate-hypervisor/3482?tag=content;search-results-rivers">Proxmox: The Ultimate Hypervisor</a><br />
<a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/proxmox-the-high-performance-virtualization-server-for-the-rest-of-us/9181">Proxmox: The high-performance virtualization for the rest of us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=160</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT Infrastructure Done Dirt Cheap, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=123</link>
		<comments>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulcrum21.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part 1, I discussed how Google, Microsoft, and Facebook have used new strategies for reducing the cost of cloud based infrastructure.  In this article, we&#8217;ll explore smaller scale infrastructures. Why not just copy the Google model?  One size does not fit &#8230; <a href="http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=123">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://fulcrum21.com/?m=201112" target="_blank">Part 1</a>, I discussed how Google, Microsoft, and Facebook have used new strategies for reducing the cost of cloud based infrastructure.  In this article, we&#8217;ll explore smaller scale infrastructures. Why not just copy the Google model?  One size does not fit all.  Here are some tips for building cheap infrastructure without sacrificing reliability:</p>
<h2>Think Inside the Box</h2>
<p>In most data centers, compute services and storage services reside on separate hardware. Storage area networks (SAN) and network attached storage (NAS) allow storage resources to be pooled, resulting in efficient storage utilization.  Dedicated storage servers often have snapshot, replication, and deduplication capabilities as well as redundant power, RAID controllers, and hot-swap drives.  However, pooling of storage can also create bottlenecks between applications and data. Furthermore, virtualization can create network bottlenecks due to server consolidation. The way around these bottlenecks has been to use faster interconnects such as 10 gigabit Ethernet (10GbE), Infiniband, or Fiber Channel.  These technologies can be very expensive. For instance, a 48-port level 3 gigabit switch might cost $2000, whereas a 48-port 10GbE level 3 switch costs around $30,000.  By avoiding expensive interconnect hardware, more is available to spend on SSD drives or additional RAM to increase performance.  While combining compute and storage services inside the same box may appear to be going backwards in terms of using local storage, there&#8217;s one important difference now: virtualization. Virtualization allows storage software to co-exist on the same server as virtual machines. This can be achieved by using <a href="http://blog.laspina.ca/ubiquitous/encapsulating-vt-d-accelerated-zfs-storage-within-esxi">PCI Pass Through</a> with Vmware or Xenserver along with storage appliance software such as <a href="http://nexenta.com">NexentaStor</a>. Another approach is to use an <a href="https://www.illumos.org/">Illumos</a>/OpenSolaris derived OS like <a href="http://smartos.org/">SmartOS</a> which combines <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel-based_Virtual_Machine">KVM</a> for virtualization with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS">ZFS</a> as the underlying storage.  Within the same box, speed of access between compute and storage services equals or exceeds going outside the box at a much reduced cost. Virtualization combined with today&#8217;s increased cpu, memory, and storage densities makes it possible to build a &#8220;datacenter in a box&#8221; that is capable of handling the requirements of many small to medium-sized businesses.</p>
<h2><strong>Virtualization</strong></h2>
<p>One of the big selling points of virtualization is that it allows for consolidation of servers and therefore reduced capital and operating costs.   Virtualization can also reduce costs by saving time and reducing risk as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>Virtual machine images are stored as files allowing them to be easily backed up, restored, migrated, cloned, replicated, or compressed.</li>
<li>Virtual machines present standardized hardware to the guest OS regardless of the underlying physical hardware.  Therefore, restoring to different hardware is quick and doesn&#8217;t require loading new drivers.</li>
<li>Allocating virtual hardware such as cpus, memory, nics, and storage can be done on the fly without having to physically open up a server.</li>
<li>An entire virtual infrastructure can be built including servers, firewalls, routers, and switches in a much shorter time than it would take to build an equivalent physical infrastructure.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Open Source</strong></h2>
<p>This may be stating the obvious, but for many services such as web hosting, firewall, DNS and ftp, open source options are often more stable than their proprietary counterparts. They are also cheaper, as in free, if you are willing to learn a bit about their implementation.  If not, many companies offer commercial support which still provides significant savings over proprietary options.  Here&#8217;s a small sampling of some of the open source software we use here at Fulcrum21:  Proxmox VE, Ubuntu Linux, CentOS, Illumos, Virtualbox, Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM), X2go, Putty, Libre Office, Open Office, Thunderbird, and many more.</p>
<h2>Ebay</h2>
<p>Ebay sellers are great for offering hardware at attractive discounts, but you have to know the market to be sure you&#8217;re getting a deal, so do your research.  Whereas Google, Microsoft, and Facebook standardize on specific hardware, virtualization provides a way to get around this.  Within the same cpu family, virtual machines of the same version appear to be running on the same hardware regardless of the actual underlying physical hardware. Therefore, it is possible to purchase a batch of servers from Ebay based on the best price rather than trying to match the previous brand or model. Other hardware such as switches, routers, etc. can be found at significant discounts too, as well as just about anything related to computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=123</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT Infrastructure Done Dirt Cheap, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=69</link>
		<comments>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=69#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulcrum21.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Google began to unveil the details of its infrastructure several years ago (http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html), a company its size typically purchased expensive servers with redundant power supplies, RAID controllers, hot-swap drives, ECC memory, etc.  Instead, Google was building its own servers &#8230; <a href="http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=69">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before Google began to unveil the details of its infrastructure several years ago (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html">http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html</a>), a company its size typically purchased expensive servers with redundant power supplies, RAID controllers, hot-swap drives, ECC memory, etc.  Instead, Google was building its own servers using commodity components with little redundancy built in! With servers numbering in the hundreds of thousands, they realized there would still be numerous failures regardless of server reliability.  Therefore, Google built fault tolerance into their software rather than trying to do it all in hardware and were able to reduce costs in the process.  Furthermore, data center design changed to improve power efficiency and reduce cooling requirements. Standard shipping containers with racks full of densely packed servers allowed a modular design.   Large UPS&#8217;s were eschewed in favor of each server having an on-board 12 volt battery.</p>
<p>Since then, Microsoft has revealed a similar hardware strategy (<a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/04/25/microsoft-reveals-its-specialty-servers-racks/">http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/04/25/microsoft-reveals-its-specialty-servers-racks</a>) as well as Facebook with its promotion of &#8220;vanity free&#8221; servers through the Open Compute Project (<a href="http://opencompute.org/">http://opencompute.org/</a>). Cloud based infrastructure on the scale of Google, Microsoft, or Facebook has resulted in new strategies for reducing infrastructure costs while maintaining reliability.  What strategies are available for smaller scale infrastructures?  This will be the subject of <a href="http://fulcrum21.com/?p=123">Part 2</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=69</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome!</title>
		<link>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=20</link>
		<comments>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?p=20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulcrum21.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We built our new website using WordPress to allow for easy blogging. Check back for future articles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We built our new website using WordPress to allow for easy blogging. Check back for future articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulcrum21.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=20</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

